Query: Will X be hired by the directorate this year?

Note: The experimental system of nonastrological geomancy I’m using is detailed here. Moreover, since this query has more than one grammatical object, I chose the “directorate” to be represented by the 3rd figure.

Interpretation: The 6th figure representing the basic answer to the query is Rubeus, which I’m interpreting more in terms of anger and frustration in this context, likely answering “no” to the query. As a side note, this figure’s “unvarying” mobility might be further supporting this conclusion, signifying an impediment to X’s employment. ¶ The 1st figure representing X is Conjunctio, which may be foretelling that she’ll at least be interviewed for the position. However, the 3rd figure representing the directorate (Albus) could suggest that their final decision will be largely guided by prudence. ¶ The 4th figure (Amissio) is discordant with the 6th (no shared mobility or elemental attributes), indicating that it represents a factor related to X that’ll be working against the answer to the query previously noted. Amissio here might therefore be referring to X’s recent layoff from her previous job (due to funding cuts), which the directorate may sympathize with, especially given that X’s former employer has partnered with the directorate in the past on a number of successful projects. Moreover, the 5th figure (Cauda Draconis) is discordant with the 6th, indicating that it represents a factor related to the directorate that’ll also be working against the aforementioned answer. Cauda here might therefore suggest that the ending of something or departure of someone within the organization will be compelling them to hire X for the position. ¶ The 2nd figure representing the main factor driving/underlying this entire matter is Fortuna Minor, which I’m admittedly struggling to interpret at the moment, but which could imply that the directorate’s decision will hinge on the amount of short-term support X would need in their new role. ¶ Lastly, I couldn’t help but notice the distribution of mobility in this chart, i.e., there are three “exiting” figures and three “unvarying” figures, which I feel is also tilting the outcome in an unfavorable direction. Let’s see what happens.